<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YOUR LAST CHANCE IS TOMORROW: Dirt on Delight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theartblog.org/2009/06/your-last-chance-is-tomorrow-dirt-on-delight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theartblog.org/2009/06/your-last-chance-is-tomorrow-dirt-on-delight/</link>
	<description>Roberta Fallon and Libby Rosof's artblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:50:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SHOW REVIEWED: Nathan Prouty: Piles &#38; Countertops</title>
		<link>http://theartblog.org/2009/06/your-last-chance-is-tomorrow-dirt-on-delight/comment-page-1/#comment-7371</link>
		<dc:creator>SHOW REVIEWED: Nathan Prouty: Piles &#38; Countertops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theartblog.org/?p=8102#comment-7371</guid>
		<description>[...] I am now also wondering if I find the sculptures of Nate Prouty so refreshing and surprising because my own knowledge of ceramic art is so lacking. I blame myself and the art world and the art school that I attended for this. I have overlooked ceramics in my own art education but I believe the reason I have overlooked it lies in the compunction of most artists and art professionals to label any work conceived in clay as a &#8220;craft&#8221; or somehow some lower form of art. The ICA recently made a rather important statement concerning this conundrum with Dirt on Delight and I already spewed some words in favor of that exhibition and this dilemma on theartblog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I am now also wondering if I find the sculptures of Nate Prouty so refreshing and surprising because my own knowledge of ceramic art is so lacking. I blame myself and the art world and the art school that I attended for this. I have overlooked ceramics in my own art education but I believe the reason I have overlooked it lies in the compunction of most artists and art professionals to label any work conceived in clay as a &#8220;craft&#8221; or somehow some lower form of art. The ICA recently made a rather important statement concerning this conundrum with Dirt on Delight and I already spewed some words in favor of that exhibition and this dilemma on theartblog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoyJoy</title>
		<link>http://theartblog.org/2009/06/your-last-chance-is-tomorrow-dirt-on-delight/comment-page-1/#comment-3599</link>
		<dc:creator>JoyJoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theartblog.org/?p=8102#comment-3599</guid>
		<description>&quot;She&#039;s All That&quot; is to &quot;Not Another Teen Movie&quot; as &quot;Dirt on Delight&quot; is to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;She&#8217;s All That&#8221; is to &#8220;Not Another Teen Movie&#8221; as &#8220;Dirt on Delight&#8221; is to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: libby</title>
		<link>http://theartblog.org/2009/06/your-last-chance-is-tomorrow-dirt-on-delight/comment-page-1/#comment-3582</link>
		<dc:creator>libby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theartblog.org/?p=8102#comment-3582</guid>
		<description>Hi, Annette, I was thinking about this show when I went to the Clay Studio&#039;s associate and student exhibits recently. I was reminded about the variety of work there can be in clay. And the miracle of it is that it can serve as a cup, or it can serve up an idea, or it can serve both functions at the same time.  To put it another way, a work of art can be of any material, just so long as that&#039;s the material that&#039;s necessary to create that particular work of art and communicate the particular idea. I don&#039;t know why clay should be a second class medium. Clay may start as mud, but when it&#039;s dry and fired, its nothing like mud; it&#039;s transformed. But until then it&#039;s an artist&#039;s dream--completely maleable, so it can be shaped to whatever purpose--and better than the sandbox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Annette, I was thinking about this show when I went to the Clay Studio&#8217;s associate and student exhibits recently. I was reminded about the variety of work there can be in clay. And the miracle of it is that it can serve as a cup, or it can serve up an idea, or it can serve both functions at the same time.  To put it another way, a work of art can be of any material, just so long as that&#8217;s the material that&#8217;s necessary to create that particular work of art and communicate the particular idea. I don&#8217;t know why clay should be a second class medium. Clay may start as mud, but when it&#8217;s dry and fired, its nothing like mud; it&#8217;s transformed. But until then it&#8217;s an artist&#8217;s dream&#8211;completely maleable, so it can be shaped to whatever purpose&#8211;and better than the sandbox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
