What I see in both McFarlane and Seidman is a subversion of those strategies of art-making to the opposite purpose. Their work takes grids and lines and bends them toward gesture. The two create color planes that refuse to lie down flat, but rather simmer in layers or under delicate skins of paint that are the very opposite of Minimalism.
In this age of computers, where the arcs and perspectives that a CAD program can create to perfection, these works are a rebellion, a reassertion of the artist’s hand, the artist’s eye and the artist’s individuality.
Ultimately, though, it’s her paintings that make me swoon. I guess I’ll use the word sensuous again. So much color is compressed here into so little space, and each area struggles to announce its individuality (right, Seidman’s “Untitled #6).
Part of what amuses me about this turn of events in the art world (okay, so I’m daring to call it a turn of events) is the lag-time in popular culture, in which today’s bionic, six-pack bodies seem to come from the same impulse as Minimalism. But true Minimalist work at this moment in time seems not to reflect the zeitgeist of the art world.
The work from Seidman and McFarlane, however, seems on the pulse–pondering the human condition in abstract form, a parallel take on the issues being mined by younger artists like the kids at Space 1026 or Vox Populi, who are using either cartoons or maximal, color-filled and stuff-filled installations to make poignant existential statements.
(A note from McFarlane: Just as a head’s up, I’m doing the Philadelphia Open Studio Tours again this year. My weekend is on October 15th and 16th. Also, I’ll have work up at the Affordable Art Fair in New York City at the end of October. Bridgette’s gallery was chosen to be in the fair and I, along with several other artists from her gallery, was chosen to have work shown in the booth there. It runs from October 27th-30th and is on Pier 92.)