The big mural involved a big number of people. About 250 children contributed images of themselves and their hopes and dreams. Somehow, Gensler had to come up with a design that incorporated the children’s images with his own in some coherent, overall design that would be acceptable to the corporate sponsor.
Did he succeed? Yes and no.
Close up, the mural is pretty satisfying. In fact, it’s the surprise of the kids stuff, busy, crunchy, non-standard, emerging from behind the giant, professionally designed figures that gives the mural its zing and helps carry it along from panel to panel.
But from far away, the details disappear behind the impact of the intense colors and the giant figures. Without the links of the crunchy details in sight, the mural does not hang together, and many of the giant figures seem expected, predictable. The repeated running figure of a cute little kid seemed glib, and it fails to tie the panels together.
Other giant figures work with panache. Take this one, which, here in Sports Central across from the Linc, looks like a kid with something else on his mind. Somehow, Gensler managed to tip his hat to the sponsoring corporation with a running child and still tuck in a reading, pensive child. That surprise–and the ambiguity of the reader’s posture– helps keep the mural alive.
I don’t always like a mural the first time I see it. Sometimes I think a mural is boring or trite or uninspired until I pass it for the 14th time, and then suddenly it seems a welcome part of the neighborhood, like the Karl Yoder Cedar Park mural at 49th and Baltimore (shown). One day, the tree against the sky took on a magical glow I had failed to notice previously. Now I look for that magic every time I pass by.
Some murals never get better, like the corporate paean to nursing at Broad and Vine. It never rises above literal.
With these thoughts in mind, my guess is I’ll grow to love this mural too. But it isn’t really love at first sight.